Heller II: Defeating Red Tape & Second Amendment Infringements

Dick Anthony Heller is still fighting for his Second Amendment rights. In a case known as "Heller II," he is one of five plaintiffs who want a court to ultimately declare Washington D.C.'s gun registry and other gun-control regulations unconstitutional.

In 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court heard District of Columbia v. Heller and ruled 5-to-4 that the Second Amendment is indeed an individual right. This decision struck down D.C.'s outright ban on handguns as well as regulations requiring all firearms be kept "unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock."

These laws made it impossible for a homeowner to use a firearm in defense of their life. They also put Dick Anthony Heller in a twisted dilemma. As a special police officer in D.C., he carried a handgun in federal office buildings to protect government personnel, but he was not allowed to have a handgun or a viable long-gun for his own protection in his D.C. home.

After the Supreme Court's 2008 decision to "give" D.C. residents their Second Amendment rights, D.C. government created a gauntlet of thorny regulations, and now very few D.C. residents have the ability to utilize their Second Amendment rights.

Almost 5 years later, Heller still can't protect himself as he goes to and from work in D.C.

Now, "Heller II" asks and attempts to answer what is surely the biggest question plaguing the Second Amendment of the U.S. Bill of Rights: When does government red tape unconstitutionally infringe upon the people's right to bear arms?

In a recent interview, Heller told me, "I'm just an ordinary guy who decided to make a stand because my constitutional rights have been infringed. I carry a gun when protecting people in a federal building, but then I check in the gun when I leave." He went on to say, "I often get off work at midnight. So I have to make my way home disarmed through D.C. I've been approached by bad guys, but at least I'm a guy. If I were a woman, I wouldn't be able to keep this job. It would be too risky. It's these basic rights of life and liberty we're trying to win back with Heller II."

This challenge to D.C.'s gun laws has been working its way through the courts for a number of years. In October 2011, the U.S. Court of Appeals upheld what it called a "basic" registration of handguns, but questioned whether any registration of rifles and shotguns is constitutional. The court remanded the case to the district court to gather further evidence on whether D.C.'s gun laws are reasonable.

As Heller explained, "D.C. obviously grabbed every gun-control restriction they could find from the 50 states and included almost all of them in its gun-control ordinances. This is how they created a system so burdensome to the Second Amendment, we still don't have our right to bear arms here in D.C."

The plaintiffs' attorneys, Stephen Halbrook and Dan Peterson, have deposed D.C.'s witnesses and filed a motion in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, asking Judge James Boasberg for summary judgment on whether D.C.'s gun registration and other laws are "reasonable" based on the evidence.

The plaintiff's briefing shows D.C. gun regulations are clearly unconstitutional, for three major reasons:

1. A Gun Registry for Good Guys?

Starting Jan. 1, 2014, every gun owner in D.C. who has registered a firearm since 1976 must be fingerprinted and photographed at police headquarters.

Halbrook believes, "If D.C. gets its way, gun owners will have to do this every three years. Even those who have the time and money to make it through this difficult process will find they'll never be done, as D.C. is still trying to burden them with expiration and re-registration deadlines that, if missed, would turn them into criminals."

Halbrook also pointed out that long guns are rarely used in crimes, and this clearly shows the laws are only designed to impede people from legally owning guns.

The facts back him up. According to data provided by D.C. to the FBI for 2009, only two out of 144 murders in D.C. were known to have been committed with a long gun. In 2010, out of 131 murders in D.C., not one is reported to have been committed with a rifle or shotgun. In 2011, only one murder in D.C. was reported to have been committed with a long gun (a shotgun), out of 108 total murders.

Given that less than one percent of murders are being committed with long guns, how can D.C. justify the onerous need for fingerprinting residents every three years? For context, realize that for the same time period — 2009-2011 — 96 homicides were reportedly committed with knives and weapons other than guns and fists.

When questioned about the need for these laws, D.C.'s witnesses weren't able to cite a single study indicating that its firearm registration prevents illegal possession of firearms. Actually, studies show that registration laws haven't had a measurable affect on crime rates or gun violence.

During deposition, D.C. Police Chief Cathy L. Lanier even conceded: "It is not clear how firearms' registration records could be used to 'prevent' a crime." Other than possession offenses, Lanier could not "recall any specific instance where registration records were used to determine who committed a crime."

Lanier couldn't even provide a single example of a registration record being used to solve a crime committed with a long gun.

2. Residents Must Apply to the Government for Their Rights?

Washington D.C. is essentially forcing residents to seek permission above and beyond a federal background check for owning any firearm. According to D.C. laws, "no person or organization in the District shall possess or control any firearm, unless the person or organization holds a valid registration certificate for the firearm."

Possession of an unregistered firearm is punishable by imprisonment for one year and a $1,000 fine, and a second offense yields up to five years in prison and a $5,000 fine.

D.C. doubles down on its red-tape infringements by requiring residents — they deem them "applicants" — to appear in-person at the police for fingerprinting and photographing. There are also fees to register each firearm.

To find a legal precedent for using a registry for long guns, D.C. cites an 1896 law from the Republic of Hawaii that required a license to possess a firearm — 1896 Hawaii was of course an independent and undemocratic country.

D.C. argues that "laws requiring the registration of certain types of long guns at the federal level has [sic] proven 'highly successful' in reducing the use of such long-guns in crime." D.C. naturally doesn't cite any data or study to back this claim up.

D.C. also cites an 1893 Florida statute that empowered officials to grant a license for individuals to carry a pistol or repeating rifle. However, this law didn't require a license to possess a firearm, and according to background dug up by Halbrook, was only passed "for the purpose of disarming the negro laborers," according to one of the justices at the time.

Those outdated case laws beg the question: Why, after the Supreme Court decided Heller in 2008, has D.C. decided to float a re-registration scheme?

Halbrook noted, "[D.C.'s] own witnesses cite no studies showing that periodic registration renewal or reporting requirements reduce crime or protect police officers."

3. Is D.C. Really Doing this for "Officer Safety"?

Police Chief Lanier and the officers who oversee D.C.'s Firearms Registration Section are quoted in the brief from the plaintiffs' attorneys, noting there were only two handgun applications denied by D.C. in 2011 and 2012. During this period, not a single rifle or shotgun application was refused. This, of course, isn't surprising. Rather than having themselves voluntarily fingerprinted and photographed, criminals are just packing guns when and where they see fit.

The numbers illustrate the realities. From 2007 to 2013, the police seized 12,000 unregistered firearms. Meanwhile, only 36 registered guns were seized during this same period. Of those 36 guns, only 17 were involved in charges against a registered firearm owner. Of those 17 cases, only two resulted in convictions for a violent crime. Clearly, the good guys with the guns — the ones burdened by gun-control regulations — are not the problem.

In actuality, this case has shown that officers responding to calls are not even being informed if there is a registered firearm at a location. Police cars aren't equipped with a computer that can access the firearms registry, and dispatchers can't check the registration database. Right now, the whole system is simply a gauntlet designed to prevent law-abiding citizens from utilizing their Second Amendment rights.

Halbrook believes this case will likely be decided the spring of 2014. This decision will surely be used as a precedent in other cases where citizens are challenging burdensome restrictions to their Second Amendment rights. We'll keep you informed as this case is adjucated.

GET THE NEWSLETTER Join the List and Never Miss a Thing.

Recommended Articles

See More Recommendations

Popular Videos

Gun Clips with Joe Mantegna - 94 WINCHESTER

Gun Clips with Joe Mantegna - 94 WINCHESTER

Joe Mantegna talks about the origins of the 94 Winchester rifle.

Armscor Semi-Auto Shotguns

Armscor Semi-Auto Shotguns

We look at the new shotguns from Armscor - the VR80 and the brand new bullpup VRBP100.

Feeding Your Firearms with Aguila Ammunition

Feeding Your Firearms with Aguila Ammunition

A group of competitive shooters talk about new products from Aguila , the Aguila Cup, and everyone's favorite new guns launched at the 2019 SHOT show.

A New Season of G&A TV

A New Season of G&A TV

In this new season of Guns & Ammo TV, we introduce two new series and bring back a viewer favorite - Camera's Don't Lie. We look at long-range tech and see how to make shots previously thought impossible. Next we visit ISS Prop House in Hollywood.

See More Popular Videos

Trending Articles

The Savage MSR 15 Competition is an out-of-the-box racehorse ready to help you win 3-Gun matches. Here's why. Reviews

Savage MSR 15 Competition Review

James Tarr - May 21, 2019

The Savage MSR 15 Competition is an out-of-the-box racehorse ready to help you win 3-Gun...

The one glaring weakness in the .30-­caliber magnum cartridge lineup is best highlighted by examining the requirement around which Hornady designed the .300 PRC; the requirement came from the U.S. Special Operations Command (SOCOM). Rifle

.300 PRC Review

Tom Beckstrand - March 12, 2019

The one glaring weakness in the .30-­caliber magnum cartridge lineup is best highlighted by...

The Browning X-Bolt Hell's Canyon Speed Long Range McMillan is arguably the best production-grade precision hunting rifle available. Rifles

Review: Browning X-Bolt Hell's Canyon Speed Long Range McMillan

Joseph von Benedikt - March 25, 2019

The Browning X-Bolt Hell's Canyon Speed Long Range McMillan is arguably the best...

From milled slides to optics-included packages, these pistol options are all red-dot sight ready. Handguns

14 Red Dot Ready Pistols You Must See

James Tarr - December 20, 2018

From milled slides to optics-included packages, these pistol options are all red-dot sight...

See More Trending Articles

More 2nd Amendment

On April 27, 2020, the United States Supreme Court handed-down its first opinion related to the Second Amendment since McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010). 2nd Amendment

U.S. Supreme Court Punts on the Second Amendment

G&A Staff - April 30, 2020

On April 27, 2020, the United States Supreme Court handed-down its first opinion related to...

ATF is currently considering a ban on certain pistol braces that could make close to one-million law-abiding Americans felons overnight. 2nd Amendment

ATF Banning Arm Braces for Pistols?

Guns & Ammo Staff - June 25, 2020

ATF is currently considering a ban on certain pistol braces that could make close to...

We must oppose the erosion of our rights. The slow and quiet dissolution of our freedoms should alarm all of us.  2nd Amendment

Erosion of Our Rights

Keith Wood - January 02, 2020

We must oppose the erosion of our rights. The slow and quiet dissolution of our freedoms...

Perspective from the National Shooting Sports Foundation.

NSSF: Gun-Control Grabs Taxpayer Protection Funds for Anti-Gun Candidates

Larry Keane - July 27, 2020

Perspective from the National Shooting Sports Foundation.

See More 2nd Amendment

GET THE MAGAZINE Subscribe & Save

Digital Now Included!


Give a Gift   |   Subscriber Services


GET THE NEWSLETTER Join the List and Never Miss a Thing.

Get Digital Access.

All Guns and Ammo subscribers now have digital access to their magazine content. This means you have the option to read your magazine on most popular phones and tablets.

To get started, click the link below to visit mymagnow.com and learn how to access your digital magazine.

Get Digital Access

Not a Subscriber?
Subscribe Now