Skip to main content

Ammunition Performance Labels

Ammunition Performance Labels

You don’t have to look very far in advertising material to find claims of match-grade performance. The term “match” is being used so often that many wonder if it means anything anymore.

The impetus for match loads arose from the early days of the National Matches, which were started in 1903 by the U.S. Congress and the U.S. Army. They were instituted to improve military marksmanship and national defense preparedness. The first National Matches were held at Sea Girt, New Jersey, in September 1903. The matches were attended by teams from the Army, Navy and Marine Corps, as well as state militias and National Guard organizations. Pistol competition events were added to the National Matches in 1904. Then, in 1907, the National Matches were moved to Camp Perry, Ohio, where they continue to be shot during July through August.

At that time, the M1903 Springfield was new and was replacing Krag-­Jørgensen rifles. The ’03 earned a reputation for high levels of accuracy over its many years of service and subsequent use by civilians. The cartridge used in that rifle was first the .30-­’03 Government featuring the same 220-­grain round nose (RN) projectile as its predecessor, the .30-­40 Krag. However, the .30-­’03 produced 300 feet-­per-­second (fps) higher velocity. It’s easy to picture the frustration of trying to shoot a slow, 220-­grain bullet with a mediocre ballistic coefficient (BC) in the tricky winds at Camp Perry. The ’03 was the last gasp of the old-school thinking behind its slow and heavy round-­nose bullet.

The legendary .30-­’06 Springfield cartridge was introduced in 1906 and replaced the .30-­’03. It featured a 150-­grain spitzer flat-­base projectile fired at 2,700 fps. The .30-­’06 provided a flatter trajectory and made hitting a target easier at longer ranges. The M1903 Springfield’s chambering was then changed to .30-­’06 and most .30-­’03-­chambered rifles were changed to .30-­’06. With good ammunition, it is not hard to get an M1903 Springfield to shoot 1 minute of angle (MOA), which is 1.047 inches (commonly rounded down to 1 inch) at 100 yards.


Was the ammo of the period up to the potential of that rifle? The answer is no. I have never had the opportunity to shoot early 1900s offerings, but I’ve shot a considerable amount of World War II- and Korean War-­vintage ammo. I have fired this ammo in both high-­quality rifles and through a heavy-­barrel machine rested to test accuracy.


Typical accuracy of .30-­’06 military arsenal World War II-­period loads generally shoot in the 2-­ to 3-­MOA range. There were certainly some lots of ammo that shot better than this, but 2 to 3 MOA is typical accuracy. At 600 yards, this ammunition would have printed groups between 15 and 18 inches. Scores were not that impressive by today’s expectations. The lack of accuracy in military ball created the demand for better-­performing ammunition used in competition.

First On The Scene 

The first match ammunition for competition use in the modern era was produced by Frankfort Arsenal (FA) in 1908. It used the M1906 150-­grain, full-­metal-­jacket (FMJ), flat-­base spitzer bullet that was used in the .30-­’06 ball cartridge. This bullet would be the standard through 1919. During this period the best shooting lots of production ammo were set aside for use as match ammunition. No efforts were made to produce special projectiles or ammunition. In 1919, the FA No. 26 primer was used with the FA 70 priming compound. This corrosive primer would be the standard for many decades.

Ammunition-Performance-Labels-1
Made for the U.S. Army, these collectible “match”-marked boxes featured a 173-grain FMJ projectile traveling an average of 2,640 fps. Cases were headstamped “FA” followed by the last two digits of the year.

In 1920, the match projectile was changed to a 170-­grain flat-­base projectile in an attempt to reduce copper fouling. The jacket of this projectile was a tin plated cupro-­nickel (steel). Issues with this jacket type resulted in a number of high-­pressure and uniformity problems.


In 1922, a 170-­grain 6-­degree boat­tail (BT) projectile with a gilding metal jacket was used. Gilding metal is a copper alloy of 95 percent copper and 5 percent zinc. To this day, gilding metal is the jacket material of choice. In 1924, the projectile was changed to a 9-­degree BT and the propellant was changed from Hercules HiVel to IMR propellant. That year also marked the first year the abbreviation “NM” for National Match appeared on the headstamp.

In 1925, the M1 173-­grain 9-degree BT projectile was adopted and proved to be more accurate than the M1906. It eventually became the M118 projectile that was used until the adoption of the 168-­grain Sierra MatchKing in the 7.62 NATO cartridge in 1980.

The 1930 FA lot of NM ammunition was used to test a new noncorrosive primer. It is curious to note that this new primer was a Berdan primer. The noncorrosive primer compound proved to have significant performance problems with elevated temperatures. It was withdrawn from service and quickly replaced with a lot of the old FA No. 26 primer. The problems with the chemistry and performance of this primer were directly responsible for the U.S. military not adopting a noncorrosive primer until the mid-­1950s.


The 1925 ammunition was similar to the .30-­’06 match ammunition until production stopped in favor of the new 7.62 NATO (i.e., .308 Winchester) cartridge. No National Match ammunition was produced between 1941 and 1957 because of the demands of World War II and the Korean War. The first lot of 7.62 NATO match ammunition was produced in 1964 as the XM118 with the 1925-­design M1 projectile.

The XM118 cartridge became the M118 in 1965 and was the 7.62 National Match cartridge until the introduction of the XM852, which used the Sierra 168-­grain MatchKing in 1981. The last lot of M118 was produced in 1982. The current military match ammunition is the M118LR, which is loaded with Sierra 175-­grain MatchKing projectiles.

Demand Driven 

How well did this match ammo shoot? Military ball typically shot in the 2­- to 3-­MOA range. While I have no performance data from the early days of FA match ammo, I did find data on the 1966 lot of 7.62 M118 National Match ammunition using the 1925-­vintage .30-­’06 load with 172-­grain M1 projectile. This ammo was likely produced on the same or similar equipment as in 1925. The 1966 M118 lot shot near 1 MOA at 600 yards, about 6-­inch groups at that distance.

It seems fair to conjecture that, by handpicking particularly good shooting ammo lots, early match ammunition would shoot significantly better than 2 to 3 MOA. Early match ammunition was likely in the 2 MOA average.

The M1 172-­grain projectile first produced in 1925, and shot 1 MOA in 1966, saw improvements in performance between 1925 and 1966. In the mid-­1920s, match ammo accuracy was likely in the 1½-MOA range with the new purpose-­built projectiles. By 1966, “match grade” meant that the ammunition could shoot 1 MOA. Having shot a considerable amount of M852 ammunition, I can say that by 1981 “match grade” meant 1 MOA or better.

One of the primary reasons that many of our oldest bullet manufacturers started business — including Barnes, Hornady, Nosler and Speer — was to provide better performing bullets than what were available at the time. Even after World War II, scopes were not in vogue like they are today. So, there was little point in commercial ammunition that shot much better than 2 MOA because better accuracy couldn’t be achieved with iron sights.

By the 1960s, scopes were beginning to catch on and bullet companies had become quite successful at producing higher levels of accuracy.

Serious work began in the late 1970s and early ’80s by ammunition manufacturers to provide high levels of projectile performance for both hunters and competition shooters. Ammunition manufacturers began loading bullets sourced from the bullet companies. At the same time, the bullet companies began offering their own ammunition loaded with their own proprietary bullets. The race for higher and higher performance was on.

Does Today’s Match Up? 

Let’s compare current bullet and ammunition performance to original match-­grade ammo described above. These days, bullets advertised as “match” are manufactured with uncompromising tooling tolerances, tested at much more frequent intervals to a much higher accuracy standard than other bullets.

Today, match bullets, shot from the same type of heavy test barrels and machine rests used with match bullets and ammo decades ago, generally shoot under a half ­MOA. A good many of them will shoot in the neighborhood of .375 MOA. (Remember, I’m talking about the accuracy of the bullets shot through heavy, match-­specification barrels in a controlled laboratory environment.)

Modern match ammo will use the best propellants regardless of cost, as well as low-­concentricity cases and the best primers. It is usually loaded on the most precise machines and loaded to very low bullet-­case runout.

Recently, hunters have benefited from this advancing bullet production and design technology. The Hornady Precision Hunter line loaded with ELD-­X bullets and the Federal Edge TLR line of hunting ammunition give up little in accuracy performance to match ammunition. Additionally, these bullets offer terminal performance at ranges that would have been considered ridiculous just several years ago.

What about the current state of performance from factory, mass-­produced rifles? There have been substantial improvements in the accuracy performance of rifles. These days, a gun that doesn’t shoot better than 1½ MOA is considered a poor shooter. Back in the day, a 1½ MOA rifle would have been one for bragging.

As an example of where we are today, consider the Ruger Precision Rifle (RPR) line. I use an RPR because I have a lot of experience with them. However, most every major gun company has a model of rifle that competes with the RPR, so please don’t think that I’m ignoring your favorite brand.

I have shot the RPR in 6mm Creedmoor, 6.5 Creedmoor and .308 Winchester. Every rifle I’ve fired shoots in the ¾-­MOA range with quality ammunition. Several have shot inside of ¾ MOA.

Ammunition-Performance-Labels-2
RUGER Precision Rifle, Davidson’s Exclusive: $1,400

To illustrate further, I have an eight-­shot test group delivered by my RPR chambered in 6mm Creedmoor. This group measured .48 ­inch at 100 yards. This type of accuracy performance with an out-­of-­the-­box factory rifle and factory ammo was unheard of back at the start of the National Matches.

There is no doubt that the phrase “match grade” has been abused in some cases. However, the general accuracy level of a good many current-­production bullet, ammunition and firearms products would certainly fulfill the definition of “match” as it was originally used in the early 20th century. In many cases, performance of modern match loads exceeds the definition of the word as it was defined at the high point of match competition in the ’60s and ’70s.

Performance of bullets, ammunition and firearms has gotten so good that we don’t pay much attention to anything that doesn’t shoot 1 MOA or better. Shooters of 70 to 80 years ago wouldn’t believe us if we told them the accuracy that we can achieve with the over-­the-­counter match products available today. 


Current Magazine Cover

Enjoy articles like this?

Subscribe to the magazine.

Get access to everything Guns & Ammo has to offer.
Subscribe to the Magazine

GET THE NEWSLETTER Join the List and Never Miss a Thing.

Recommended Articles

See More Recommendations

Popular Videos

Guns & Ammo TV: Wheelgun vs. Pistol

Guns & Ammo TV: Wheelgun vs. Pistol

In this segment of “Pros vs. Joes,” we put competitive shooter and author James Tarr against Guns & Ammo TV cameraman Nathan Wilt. With handguns, they see who can knock down plates the fastest on two Revolution Targets Heavy Duty Plate Racks. Here's the catch: Tarr has to use a Colt King Cobra in .357 Mag. while Wilt shoots a Smith & Wesson M&P9 M2.0 in 9mm.

Umarex Air Ruger 10/22 Rifle Review

Umarex Air Ruger 10/22 Rifle Review

In this segment of "Guns & Ammo TV," Gun Tech Editor Richard Nance and Pro-Shooter Jim Tarr head to the range to wring out the Umarex Air Ruger 10/22.

Cameras Don

Cameras Don't Lie: Subsonic 9mm vs. .300 Blackout

In this segment of "Cameras Don't Lie," a subsonic-ammo showdown, 9mm vs. .300 Blackout fired from AR rifles.

Red vs. Green Lasers: Visibility in Bright Light

Red vs. Green Lasers: Visibility in Bright Light

In this segment of “At The Range,” Handgunning Editor Jeremy Stafford and contributor Patrick Sweeney compare the visibility of red and green lasers in outdoor, sunny conditions.

See More Popular Videos

Trending Articles

The story of a confederate sniper’s revenge and an exclusive look at his rifle.The Story of Civil War Sniper Jack Hinson and His Rifle Historical

The Story of Civil War Sniper Jack Hinson and His Rifle

Kyle Lamb - January 12, 2018

The story of a confederate sniper’s revenge and an exclusive look at his rifle.

The Pulsar Thermion XG50 Thermal Riflescope is the first-ever riflescope to combine a BAE sensor, onboard recording, automatic & manual calibration options, multiple color palettes, and manual focus.Pulsar Thermion XG50 Thermal Riflescope - First Look Optics

Pulsar Thermion XG50 Thermal Riflescope - First Look

Guns & Ammo Staff - September 02, 2020

The Pulsar Thermion XG50 Thermal Riflescope is the first-ever riflescope to combine a BAE...

In this segment of “At The Range,” Handgunning Editor Jeremy Stafford and contributor Patrick Sweeney compare the visibility of red and green lasers in outdoor, sunny conditions. Red vs. Green Lasers: Visibility in Bright Light Accessories

Red vs. Green Lasers: Visibility in Bright Light

Guns & Ammo Staff - August 24, 2020

In this segment of “At The Range,” Handgunning Editor Jeremy Stafford and contributor Patrick...

In this segment of Air Gun Reviews: Ruger 10/22 Air Rifle Rifles

Air Gun Reviews: Ruger 10/22 Air Rifle

Guns & Ammo Staff - September 02, 2020

In this segment of "Guns & Ammo TV," Gun Tech Editor Richard Nance and Pro-Shooter Jim Tarr...

See More Trending Articles

More Rifle

Barnaul announced its .300 AAC Blackout ammo is now available in the U.S.Barnaul .300 AAC Blackout Ammo – First Look Rifle

Barnaul .300 AAC Blackout Ammo – First Look

Guns & Ammo Staff - July 27, 2020

Barnaul announced its .300 AAC Blackout ammo is now available in the U.S.

Economy ammunition will extend your range session, but what are the tradeoffs?Cheap Ammo Tradeoffs Rifle

Cheap Ammo Tradeoffs

Aaron Carter - May 15, 2020

Economy ammunition will extend your range session, but what are the tradeoffs?

The Hornady ELD line of bullets are ballistic marvels. Hornady developed them using Doppler radar technology and optimized the design for both competition (ELD-M) and hunting (ELD-X) applications.Guns & Ammo TV: Development of Hornady ELD Rifle

Guns & Ammo TV: Development of Hornady ELD

Guns & Ammo Staff - May 28, 2020

The Hornady ELD line of bullets are ballistic marvels. Hornady developed them using Doppler...

Guns & Ammo Rifles & Optics Editor Tom Beckstrand was on location in Idaho where he pushed the limits of the 5.56 NATO cartridge in this segment of “Long Range Tech” for Guns & Ammo TV.Guns & Ammo TV: Shooting 1,270 Yards with the 5.56 NATO Rifle

Guns & Ammo TV: Shooting 1,270 Yards with the 5.56 NATO

Guns & Ammo Staff - August 10, 2020

Guns & Ammo Rifles & Optics Editor Tom Beckstrand was on location in Idaho where he pushed the...

See More Rifle

Magazine Cover

GET THE MAGAZINE Subscribe & Save

Digital Now Included!

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Give a Gift   |   Subscriber Services

PREVIEW THIS MONTH'S ISSUE Arrow

Buy Digital Single Issues

Don't miss an issue.
Buy single digital issue for your phone or tablet.

Buy Single Digital Issue on the Guns & Ammo App

Other Magazines

See All Other Magazines

Special Interest Magazines

See All Special Interest Magazines

GET THE NEWSLETTER Join the List and Never Miss a Thing.

Phone Icon

Get Digital Access.

All Guns and Ammo subscribers now have digital access to their magazine content. This means you have the option to read your magazine on most popular phones and tablets.

To get started, click the link below to visit mymagnow.com and learn how to access your digital magazine.

Get Digital Access

Not a Subscriber?
Subscribe Now