What put Ruger firearms on my personal radar was not the company’s original Standard .22 pistol (I’m too young for that). Nor was it the Ruger 10/22 rifle (I’m too old for that). It was the company’s Single-Six Convertible.

I bought one used, in 1965, for 40 bucks. It was blued, had fixed sights, a 6½-inch barrel and no transfer bar. Considering the amount of use I’ve gotten out of it since, it was easily the best gun deal I ever made. It’ll still keep a cylinderful of most 40-grain .22 Mag loads inside of a 50 cent piece at 25 yards.

There have been a lot of variants on the design since—adjustable-sighted models, New Models (with transfer bar) and stainless models. The latest is the Single-Nine. Obviously featuring a nine-shot cylinder instead of the classic six-shot, the Single-Nine is not a convertible model. There’s no extra .22 Long Rifle cylinder in the cool little red felt pouch I remember from my youth. From its tall fiber optic front sight to its hardwood “Gunfighter” grips, this 6½-inch-barreled stainless single action is .22 Magnum all the way.

This simplified the chore of rounding up ammo for a trip to the range—my final assortment included loads ranging in weight from 30-grain Federal Premium JHPs on up to 45-grain Hornady Critical Defense FTPs.

I did all my grouping at 25 yards. All groups were nine-shot; I didn’t want to cherry pick my way around a suspect charge hole, and shooting them all—five, six, nine, whatever—is pretty much the best way to figure out a revolver’s real-world potential. I do know some accuracy-obsessive types who shoot five-shot groups from each charge hole, figure out which handles a specific load best, and then scribe the most accurate ones for future reference. I like to shoot tight groups as much as the next guy, but that seems a bit excessive.

The results were in keeping with my past experiences with .22 Magnums (handgun and rifle)—namely, that the 40-grain bullets usually perform best. In this case, the top performer was the old reliable CCI Maxi Mag 40-grain HP, which averaged a hair over an inch. Velocity-wise, the real barnburner was, naturally, the lightweight of the bunch—Federal’s 30-grain JHP, which averaged 1,504 fps from the Single-Nine’s 6½-inch barrel.

The Single-Nine, as you might expect, performed without a hitch. The trigger broke at a manageable four pounds, but was just rough enough that, were the gun mine, I’d have things smoothed out a bit.

I have mixed feelings about the Williams Adjustable Fiber Optic sights. Those luminescent green dots are very quick to acquire and easy to line up on a bullseye target. But most folks I know employ a single-action rimfire revolver first and foremost as a field—or trail—gun. As such, you’re probably going to pack it in a holster, and I’m not sure how that tall front sight anchoring that little fiber optic noodle is going to stand up under repeated holsterings and unholsterings in and out of a snug-fitting belt rig.

As effective as they are—and they are very nice to shoot with—I’d probably see what I could do to replace them with a standard blade and adjustable rear.

The difference between the .22 Magnum and high-velocity .22 Long Rifle loads (assuming a 36- or 40-grain bullet) is, to be honest, more dramatic in a rifle than a handgun. Still, a 6½-inch .22 Mag revolver generates more velocity than Winchester’s justly revered .22 Long Rifle Power Point from a rifle. Hyper-velocity, light-bullet .22 LR loads in the past several decades have managed to alter the velocity equation to a certain extent, but I’d rather have 40-grain bullets than any of the lightweights in a small game gun, particularly when the range stretches out. And with this new Ruger, you’ve got nine of them instead of six.

But as neat as the concept of a nine-shot revolver is, however, speaking for myself, I would still opt for the convertible-cylinder concept, even if it meant sticking with a six-shot platform. It’s a question of options as well as economics. For plinking and close-range small-game shooting (with the emphasis on small), .22 Magnum ammo isn’t really necessary, nor—from a noise standpoint—is it always desirable. Then, of course, there’s cost. When I was a kid, a 50-round box of .22 Mag ammo cost around four bucks and was considered quite “spendy” for a nonreloadable item. Now, in this less-than-happy economy, premium .22 Magnum ammo runs roughly from eight to 14 bucks a box.

The perfect answer would, of course, be a “Convertible Nine.” If and when Ruger decides to tackle that one, I’ll be first in line, money in hand.


Those are nine charge holes instead of six, but everything else is as it always was.

Find out about the price and availability of the firearm covered in this article at, where you will gain instant access to the inventory of Davidson’s Inc., one of the nation’s largest factory-authorized firearm wholesalers. customers know instantly if the firearm is available and can select from offers presented by dealers in their area. The selected dealer then immediately ships the firearm via Federal Express. Perhaps best of all, guns purchased at are covered by Davidson’s Guaranteed Lifetime Replacement Program. Fast. Easy. Hassle-free.

Load Comments ( )

Don’t forget to sign up!

Get the Top Stories from Guns & Ammo Delivered to Your Inbox Every Week