Guns & Ammo Network

Collapse bottom bar

Browning X-Bolt Composite Stalker Review

by Payton Miller   |  January 3rd, 2013 6


It wouldn’t be stretching things to say that the Browning’s X-Bolt—introduced in 2009—represents an improvement over the company’s A-Bolt, which premiered back in 1985. Both are push-feed, bolt-action hunting rifles available in several configurations involving stock material, calibers, barrel, lengths, action lengths and what have you. Since both models are capable of accuracy far beyond what anyone could take advantage of in a field situation, the tweaks in the X-Bolt platform that give it an edge as far as I’m concerned center on ignition, scope mounting and feeding.

The X-Bolt’s “Feather Trigger” requires very little movement and is adjustable (between three and five pounds). The integral mount system (not included with the rifle) is unobtrusive, strong, simple and features four screws per mount. And, as Craig Boddington said a while back in reference to the rifle’s X-Lock mounting system, “Four screws per base beat the traditional two by 100 percent.” It’s almost as quick and simple to install as Ruger’s integral mount system—which, to me, has always represented the gold standard in idiot-proof mount setups.

The X-Bolt also features a smooth-feeding, flush-fitting, detachable synthetic magazine. I like it a lot better than the hybridized hinged floorplate/detachable-mag setup on the A-Bolt, which always struck me as a rather complex attempt to appeal to shooters who like the looks of a traditional floorplate, but want the convenience of a detachable mag. I’ve got no gripe against detachable magazines (I was—and still am—a big fan of Remington’s M788), and the X-Bolt’s simple, inline setup works very well.

Another notable feature on the X-Bolt is the fact that the bolt release is on right at the root of the bolt. Easy to find, access and depress when it comes time for cleaning and maintenance—or removing the bolt for a plane ride.

I recently shot—and hunted with—an X-Bolt Composite Stalker in .30-06. It’s also available with a conventional walnut or racy-looking carbon-fiber stock and can be had in calibers ranging from .223 on up to .338 Winchester Magnum. Mine was no-nonsense black with a 22-inch free-floated barrel. The first thing I did was mount a Bushnell Legend 3-9×40 variable (with a Multi-X duplex-style reticle) on it, which was—as I mentioned—a remarkably painless procedure. Full scoped and with a sling installed, the curb weight on the unloaded rifle was a hair under 8.2 pounds, but as nicely balanced as the rig was, it somehow felt lighter. The trigger felt crisper to me—though not necessarily “out of the box” lighter—than the triggers on the A-Bolts I’ve shot over the years. The pull on my test rifle broke at just under three pounds and was as crisp as I could ask for.

My next step—after bore-sighting the rifle—was to round up a relatively small but diverse assortment of ammo to take to the range. Handling a wide range of bullet weights is one of the things that keeps the .30-06 front-and-center saleswise (that and a 107-year running start on most everything else). My range bag included Winchester Supreme 150-grain Ballistic Silvertip, 168-grain Barnes Vor-TX TSX BT and Federal 180-grain Trophy Bonded. And just to really check out the recoil-absorbing properties of the X-Bolt’s Inflex Technology recoil pad, some elderly Winchester Super-X 220-grain Silvertips.

I don’t know whether I was just plain lucky as to the loads I was able to lay hands on, but they all shot great—average three-shot 100-yard groups ran from a low of three-quarters of an inch (the Winchester Supreme 150-grainers) to just under an inch and a half (Winchester Super-X 220-grainers). What impressed me even more than the size of the groups was the fact that the rifle threw them all—all of the weights—to within three inches of each other vertically and no more than an inch and a half or so left to right.

And, yes, the Inflex Technology recoil pad did make those 220s tolerable, even though they were considerably more noticeable than the lighter weights. They’re actually pretty cool, but it’s unlikely that there’s going to be a frantic resurgence in that weight for the old ’06 anytime soon.

Realistically, I’d have been perfectly happy to go hunting with any one of the loads I took to the range, but what I settled on was the 150-grain Ballistic Silvertips, figuring them to be the best match for an open-country whitetail hunt in northeastern Wyoming.

I ended up taking a buck at 140 yards across a chunk of prairie real estate, the kind of shot you think about when you think about Wyoming whitetail. The rifle/load combo obviously had the capability to reach out quite a bit farther than that, but it was perfectly OK with me not to have to put things to the test.

The X-Bolt Composite Stalker? At first glance, it simply appears to be your basic North American big-game setup—a synthetic stocked, basic-black .30-06 turnbolt with a 3-9X scope. But if I were going to buy a serious hunting rifle, it’d be on the short list. A very short list.


  • Ucola

    Just purchased the stalker in 308 win and the stainless steel stalker in 30-06 how does it compare to the Remington 700

    • Razgriz

      considering Remingtons buy out from Cerbrus arms, and making their parts in mexico, and on top of that had ANOTHER recall on their 700’s I’d say the x-bolt wins by a landslide

  • EagleWindRider

    I just purchased the X-Bolt Hunter SS in 300 win mag. Wow! What a rifle. I have many rifles in 308, 7.62×59, 223, 22lr but this was my first “Hunting Rifle”. Installed a Burris 4.5x14x42mm Scope bore sighted at 200yds and what a smoker.. Love the looks, feel and performance of this rifle. So impressed with it going to purchase a “WhiteGold” model either in 30.06, 308 or maybe another 300win mag. With the 26″ barrel and walnut stock it looks like it is shooting while sitting on my table. My M1A/M14 SA used to be my favorite but this Browning XBolt is the tits…

  • Tim

    I have the exact rifle described in this review x-bolt composite stalker. Only found one round that works real well with it (factory HSM 210 &gr Berger) has only a 22″ bbl but still get 100-150fps faster than advertised on ammo boxes. group sizes range from 1″ to 1-1/2 on different factory loads but with the hsm 210s I am getting 1/4″ groups and @ about 2700 fps!

  • PatriotsNation4

    Got the white gold medallion in .300 winmag with a Nikon Monarch 3, 2.5-10×42 in matte silver with matching rings. Choosing a load without spending time and lots of money is my next project after I lap the rings and loctite them in. Deer in New England is probably leaning me toward 168 grain of some kind.

  • Sylvaneous

    Bought this rifle, short action, in 308 for white tail hunting in 2010. Love the thing. I shoot a 150 gr. Sierra with 45.5 gr. H-4895 or whatever; its basically the same load as on the powder can label. Off the bench, it shoots near clover leaf groups. The bolt is smooth. I don’t remember any cycling problems, but I shoot reloads so once in a while I press one that isn’t perfect, so it can be my fault. The detachable nylon mag is more practical and convenient than I ever imagined. I never had any experience. It handles and feels ridiculously nice. The Inflex recoil pad works well with such a light rifle and my top-end 308 reloads. It points like your finger, carries like an old pocket knife and comes up nearly on target; super nice when a good deer is moving through tight woods at a fast clip. The bore is as smooth as glass. None of my father’s rifles has one as nice. And its super natural to shoot in the field. My older father had never shouldered the rifle. I gave it to him after killing my deer and he killed a doe trotting through the woods at over 100 meters. I can’t ask any more of a rifle after several seasons. It does have one small burr or edge in the action/receiver that leaves a small scratch on cycled brass. I will have that removed by a gunsmith this summer.

back to top