Short-barreled .38 revolvers are the favorite packing pistol of many citizens, and Smith & Wesson has had a major presence in this part of the handgun market for almost a century.
| Type: | Double-action revolver |
| Caliber: | .38 Special +P |
| Capacity: | 5 |
| Barrel length: | 1 7/8, 2 1/2 in. |
| Overall length: | 6.3, 6.9 in. |
| Weight: | 14.6, 16.1 oz. |
| Sights: | Fixed |
| Finish: | Matte aluminum alloy frame, stainless steel cylinder and barrel |
| Stocks: | Synthetic |
| MSRP: | $600 |
| Maker: | Smith & Wesson |
S&W had developed the .38 S&W Special in 1902, and in 1949, company president Carl Hellstrom requested a new small-frame revolver to fire the more powerful cartridge. The result was the famous M36, or Chiefs Special. It was offered in square- and round-butt models, as well as an Airweight version with an aluminum frame. But the exposed hammer snagged on clothing and was less than optimum for pocket carry.
Thus, in response to requests from law enforcement agencies, S&W modified the J-frame by adding a small exposed tab to permit cocking the hammer and single-action shooting, if desired. S&W called this design the “concealed” hammer, as opposed to the truly enclosed hammer of the Centennial models of 1952.
The first of two new J-frames was the M38 Bodyguard Airweight (aluminum frame), which debuted in 1955. A steel-frame version (M49) was added in 1959.
This brings us to S&W’s new iteration of the concealed-hammer J-frame, the M638. It is a typical five-shot revolver that continues the Bodyguard tradition and is chambered for the highly effective .38 Special +P loads available today.
Guns & Ammo received two new M638s for testing, and a delight they are. While the M38s and M49s were offered with two- or (occasionally) three-inch barrels, the new M638 offers a choice of a 1⅞- or a 2½-inch barrel. The new guns feature lustrous matte-finished aluminum-alloy frames, brushed-satin stainless steel cylinders and barrels, and weigh a scant 14.6 (1⅞ inch) and 16.1 (2½ inch) ounces, empty. Capacity is five rounds, and the guns are capable of single- and double-action fire, thanks to the small but effective concealed hammer.
The front sights on the two guns differ slightly. The 1⅞-inch version has a fixed ramp with a 90-degree face that is integral with the barrel. The 2½-inch model features an angled black blade that is pinned to the shallow rib atop the barrel. (One would surmise that replacement sights of different heights could be substituted, if desired.) The rear sights are fixed square grooves in the topstrap, and overall, the sight picture is very good.
The frame contains the obligatory safety lock on its left side, just below the angled cylinder release. The barrel/cylinder gaps were .005-inch on the 1⅞-inch model and .006-inch on the 2½-inch gun.
The synthetic grips are just smooth enough to allow the gun to be withdrawn from a pocket without difficulty. The model is also available with Crimson Trace Lasergrips. With its light weight, one would expect the recoil of the M638—especially with +P loads—to be pretty grim. But the grips do a great job of attenuating recoil, and both guns are very pleasant to shoot. The single-action trigger pulls broke like an icicle at a flat three pounds each. The double-action pulls are very smooth, with no stacking, at approximately 12 pounds.
On a recent tour of the S&W plant, I saw frames being forged and machined, and cylinders transformed into finished parts on ultra-modern CNC machines that are a far cry from the tooling of old. Paul Pluff of S&W noted that in the old days, it took up to 12 machines to finish a cylinder. Now they do it on one computer-controlled, multi-head unit. The result is a much more precise cylinder. Skilled craftsmen meld the parts into the whole, and it shows. The overall fit and finish of these guns is excellent.
The testing protocol was to shoot three five-shot groups from a sandbag rest at 10 yards, a realistic distance considering the guns’ purpose. A representative complement of +P and standard loads was fired, and the results are consolidated into one load table to make comparison of the two guns easy. Good friend and police detective Jens Barclay, who teaches CCW classes and is attuned to the vagaries of concealed carry, was enlisted to conduct a portion of the range tests and help with the evaluation.
The average size of all groups from both guns was 1.84 inches. The longer barrel clocked slightly higher velocities and was slightly more accurate, but the differences were slight; prospective shooters should pick the one that just feels right.
Join the G&A community! With a free account, you can add guns to the Gun Directory, contribute to the G&A Guide, comment on stories, share your guns with other members. Also, registering gives you access to the Guns&Ammo Forums!
After registering, make sure to tell us what you're interested in. The G&A website will use this information to recommend the most relevant content.