North America holds some of the most varied hunting conditions on the planet, from mountains to deserts to swamps, plains and forests, with a significant variety of game. The good news is, under any given conditionsāand for any given animalāthere are lots of good choices and relatively few that are wildly unsuitable. What is perhaps most important is that your choice gives you confidence. One of the few curses of my occupation is itās a rare blessing when I have a chance to actually use my own rifles, but I definitely have my favoritesāor at least my āideal choices.ā
In more open country I want something with more reachāspecifically for Coues whitetail, which, although smaller, are often taken at longer ranges. Although I run the risk of being called overgunned, my favorite is a .300 Weatherby Magnum. My Rifles Inc. .300 is an old friend, as is its Zeiss 4.5-14X with Rapid-Z reticle. Lately, Iām equally likely to use a Blaser R8 with a .300 Weatherby Magnum barrel (which also wears the same optic/reticle setup).
I consider the whitetail to be extremely tough pound-for-pound, and I want a bullet that will expand and do some damage. My 7x57 shoots Hornady Interbond very well, so thatās what I use in that rifle. The .300s can do a bit too much damage on a close shot, but I use them when I expect a longer-range opportunity, so accuracy is critical. Iāve had great results with Hornadyās plain old 180-grain Interlock, but Iām also getting awesome accuracy and performance with Federal's 180-grain Trophy Tip.
I donāt actually have one in that caliber right now, but my perfect pronghorn pick would be a Ruger No. 1 in .270. Itās pleasant to carry, and one shot should be plenty. Pronghorns are small, so I want plenty of scope. This is a good place for a variable with an upper magnification of 12X or 14X. The load chosen must be accurate in the rifleāthatās the most important factorābut I want bullets that will open up quickly. This is a good place for Winchester Power Points, Remington Core-Lokts, Federal Hi-Shok, Hornady Interbond or the Sierra GameKing. If you want to get a bit fancier, consider Berger's VLD, a wonderfully accurate bullet.
Over the years, Iāve been perfectly comfortable with anything from a .270 to a fast .30. More is not needed, and less doesnāt seem to make sense. Hereās another odd choice, since at this particular time I donāt own a rifle chambered to this cartridge. I had to go back and do some figuring, but I have taken more caribou with the 7mm Remington Magnum than with all other cartridges combined. It probably is the perfect choice: flat-shooting, plenty powerful, good in the wind. In caribou country the rifle should wear a weatherproof stock, either synthetic or laminate, and definitely a rust-resistant finish. The scope should be 3-9X minimum on up to maybe 4-16X, and again a trajectory-compensating reticle makes a lot of sense.
Caribou are not as big as we like to say they are, but in the 7mm Iāve never been a light-bullet guy. I generally use bullets from 160 to 165 grains, maybe āmediumā in the expansion-vs.-penetration category. However, accuracy is really more important than performance, because if you do need to reach out, you need all the accuracy you can get.ā
In general I prefer tough, deep-penetrating bullets for elk, and this is especially true if you go with lighter calibers. Think Nosler Partition, homogenous alloy bullets or any of the ātipped and bondedā bullets like AccuBond, InterBond and Swift Scirocco. But caliber and bullet weight do make a difference. In my 8mm I generally shoot 220-grain Sierra GameKings, and they have performed marvelously.
Also, while Iāve personally taken moose at bayonet range and clear out at 400 yards, it seems to me that moose are generally āstalkable,ā so long shots arenāt the norm. Since this is the case, I think Iāve been most satisfied with the .35s that I love so well: .358 Winchester, .350 Remington Magnum, .35 Whelen. That said, one of the best experiences I ever had moose hunting was with a Marlin lever action in .338 Marlin Express, an awesome little cartridge.
The target is awfully big, so you donāt need a big scope. Something on the order of a 1.5-6X or 2-7X is plenty, and thereās nothing wrong with the 3-9X. Although very tall, moose are relatively slender through the shoulders, so you donāt necessarily need the toughest bullets in the world. That being said, a moose is a big animal, so you definitely need bullets that are reasonably heavy for caliber and designed to offer adequate penetration. In the .338 Marlin, Hornadyās factory 200-grain Flex Tip (FTX) worked just fine. In the .35s Iāve had great success with Remington Core-Lokt and 250-grain Sierras.ā
But if you want to stick with rifles, the choice is still easy: a traditional tubular magazine .30-30 (Marlin or Winchester). Should I ever be convinced that I need to take another cougar, I would choose a short-barreled Model 94 Trapper. Mine wears an aperture sight, which is just fine.
Cougars are not hardy. A lot of old-time houndsmen use cartridges as mild as the .25-20, and (where legal) some swear by the Model 94 Trapper" target="_blank">.22 WMR. I want a bit more than that, but the advantage of the .30-30 is that it will enter and exit without undue damage to the pelt. My rifle shoots wonderfully with Hornadyās 160-grain FTX but equally well with Winchesterās ancient 170-grain Silvertip. This is one of the rare situations where choice of bullet is not critical.
At this writing I think Iāve taken a dozen North American rams and several goats, and Iāve used an array of cartridges from .270 Winchester to .375 H&H. The latter is a terrible choice, but the .270s, the faster 7mms and the fast .30s are all very good ones. All said and done, I think Jack OāConnor had it right all along: The .270 Winchester is a wonderful choice for North American mountain game. But for my personal favorite, Iāll go a step further: the .270 Winchester Short Magnum. On those rare occasions when long shots are required, the .270 WSM reaches out a bit better than the .270 Winchester and delivers more energy.
This last is important. Sheep are not especially hardy, but the Rocky Mountain goat is amazingly tenacious. Either way, you want to do your best to anchor them where they are. Goats are prone to inhabit steep, dangerous places, but sheep can also be found in really bad spots. If you have an animal in a position where you can take him and then recover him safely, then thatās where you want him. For this reason I like bullets that will expand quickly and transfer a lot of energy. Tipped bullets like the Ballistic Tip and SST catch a lot of flak for opening too quickly. But since very close shots are somewhat unlikely, this is exactly the performance I want on sheep and goats. If youāre uncomfortable with that, then step up to bullets like the TTSX, AccuBond, InterBond, Scirocco and so forth. Just donāt use really hard, tough bullets on mountain game.
Iāve used a lot of different scopes, and I suppose anything from 3-9X upward to maybe 4-16X is fine, but in the mountains I prefer an upper magnification of 12X or 14X, and I definitely want a trajectory-compensating reticle.
The Zeiss Rapid-Z is the system I am most familiar with, but they all work provided you learn how to use them.ā
Up close, the .45-70 is awesome, and I love the .348 Winchester. But the black bears" target="_blank">.45-70 doesnāt have the reach you might need for spot-and-stalk hunting, and the Winchester Model 71 doesnāt wear a scope very well. A Browning BLR in .358 with a low-power scope makes a great black bear rifle, but even betterāand better-suited for all conditionsāis the long-unloved .350 Remington Magnum. Mine is an MGA on one of the rare left-hand Remington M700 short actions. I have a 3-9X Trijicon on mine right now. There is no reason for more magnification, and some argument for less, but a black animal in dark shadows plays tricks on the eyes, so I strongly recommend a lighted reticle.
Tough bullets are essentialāmore so if you prefer lighter calibers. In the .35s I like 250-grain bullets, and with that much weight the design doesnāt matter so much, but in that .350 Remington I generally use 225-grain Barnes TSX, a bullet that I know darn well will penetrate no matter the size of the bear.
Hunting the grizzly bear and hunting the Alaskan brown bear are not the same. Grizzlies are somewhat smaller and are often hunted in high country where shots out to 250 yards might be called for. The larger Alaskan brown bear is generally hunted in ātighterā country. None of us has taken many of these bears, so I freely admit my choices are based on conventional wisdom as well as personal experience. For grizzly I think thereās nothing better than a fast .33āthe .338 Remington Ultra Mag. or .340 Weatherby Magnum. But if the recoil is too muchāand it might beātone it down to the .338 Winchester Magnum. Because range can be involved, a 3-9X scope is a good choice. For bullets, stick with 250-grain slugs with known penetrating capabilities. I used a 250-grain Nosler Partition on a couple of grizzlies. Thatās still a benchmark bullet, but all heavy-for-caliber 250-grain slugs will do the job.
You could use the same setup for brown bear and youād be just fine, but I think this is one of the only situations in North America where the .375 H&H is still king. But if you prefer a .375 Ruger, thatās fine with me. And if you can handle the added recoil of a .375 RUM or .375 Weatherby Magnum, thatās maybe even better. Skip the 270-grain bullets and use a 300-grain slug, then hope you run into a monster thatās twice the size of any grizzly. Choose serious bullets: Swift A-Frame, Barnes TSX, Hornady DGX, Nosler Partition.
The challenge with the .375 is that all too often we saddle them with a low-powered ādangerous gameā scope with maximum power of 4X or 5X. There is much potential for a 200-yard shot, which any .375 can handle. But donāt make things more difficult by going āminimalā on magnification. Consider a scope with an upper level of 6X, 7X or 8X. Keep it turned down unless you need the magnification and you should be ready for any shot that comes along. By the way, brown bear country is pretty wet, so this is the place for synthetic and/or laminate stocks.
As youāve undoubtedly gathered, Iām mostly a bolt-action guy. Call it a generational thing. Realistically, my big bears are probably all behind me (unless I hit the lottery and go for a polar bear). All have been taken with bolt actions, but in my experience all bears are tough, and the bigger the tougher. Clean, one-shot kills arenāt the norm. So if I were to start over, I would definitely use my Blaser R8 with an appropriate barrel. The straight-pull action is significantly faster and requires less movement, and on big bears this might be critical.